Case studyIllustrative

From three weeks to three days: how Al-Madar replaced four systems with Modir.

ChallengeLegacy stitched stack — foreign-built CRM, early-2000s portfolio accounting, paper onboarding, custodian portal — could not deliver SAMA-grade evidence on demand.

OutcomeFour systems replaced for the pilot scope. Client-review time down 64%. New-client onboarding from three weeks to three days.

Region
Saudi Arabia · Riyadh
Sector
Private bank

Illustrative — placeholder customer for design preview. Customer name and quotes are illustrative; technical content reflects how Modir is deployed in practice.

Customer profile

Al-Madar Private Bank (illustrative) is a Riyadh-headquartered private bank with approximately twelve billion riyals of assets under management across three offices. Their relationship managers serve some of the kingdom's oldest family wealth; their compliance team answers to SAMA and the CMA. Before Modir, they ran on a stitched stack — a foreign-built CRM, a portfolio accounting system from the early 2000s, an onboarding tool that produced PDFs to be wet-signed, and a custody connection accessed through the custodian's browser portal.

The challenge

Three problems made the platform untenable. First, every relationship manager began each client review by opening four systems, and the average review took fifty minutes — half of it in tab-switching. Second, the compliance team was running monthly spot-checks against audit logs that lived in three different formats, and findings always became debates because there was no single source of truth. Third, modernization felt impossible: the foreign-built CRM was too embedded to remove, but every Arabic and Hijri retrofit it received made it more expensive to maintain.

The breaking point was a SAMA examination in late 2024. The exam team asked for a structured export of every client interaction, every order, and every policy decision for a specific quarter — with timestamps in Hijri, content addresses for documents, and integrity proof. Producing it took eleven days and required pulling three engineers off feature work.

Why Modir

Al-Madar evaluated three vendors and a build option. Modir won on three criteria: data residency (the platform runs in me-central-1 with KSA data pinned — no cross-region replication unless explicitly enabled), localization architecture (Arabic and Hijri are first-class — not retrofitted), and audit posture (the hash-chained audit and signed exports map directly to what the SAMA exam team had asked for).

The clinching factor was the discovery workshop. In ninety minutes, the Modir team mapped Al-Madar's identity model to Zitadel + OpenFGA + OPA, walked through the audit chain construction, and showed a sample SAMA-aligned signed export. The compliance team flipped from skeptical to advocate in the same session.

Implementation timeline

  • Week 1 — Discovery. 90-minute architecture workshop. Output: tenant scope, identity model, locale defaults, integration list, costed pilot.
  • Weeks 2–3 — Provision. Tenant created in me-central-1. Vault namespace seeded. Argo CD wired. Zitadel project provisioned with relationship managers, ops, compliance roles. OpenFGA tuples written. SAMA-aligned suitability questionnaire deployed.
  • Weeks 4–6 — Migrate. One advisor's full book imported (40 clients, 80 accounts, two years of transactions). Custodian feed wired. KYC vendor adapter (existing local provider) plugged in via the adapter pattern. Document templates ported to Carbone with locale formatters.
  • Weeks 7–8 — Soft launch. First five advisors operational. First Modir-generated signed export reviewed against the previous SAMA submission. Audit chain genesis and first hourly verification reported clean.

Outcomes

The pilot ran into Q1 2025. By the end of the eighth week, the bank had replaced four systems for the pilot scope, the average client-review time had fallen by 64%, and onboarding for a new individual client — previously three weeks of paper signatures and back-office data entry — was three days end-to-end. The compliance team produced their next quarterly evidence pack on demand, in under a minute.

Quote

We expected the move to feel risky. Instead it felt obvious. The advisors stopped switching tabs. The compliance team stopped arguing about logs. The Saudi tenant was live in our region from day one. The hardest part was deciding what to do with the people we'd hired to maintain the old stitching.

Operations Director, Al-Madar Private Bank — Illustrative

Where they are today

Al-Madar (illustrative) has expanded the pilot to forty advisors across two offices, added the trading workflow with FIX connectivity to two custodians, and turned on the AI briefing graph for senior relationship managers — locale-aware Arabic outputs reviewed by the advisor before going to the client. The next milestone is the Eastern Province office in Q3 2026.

Outcome metrics

  • 4 systems replaced for the pilot scope
  • −64% client review time
  • 3 days new-client onboarding (was 3 weeks)
  • 11 → 0.05 minutes SAMA evidence pack
  • 100% hash-chain integrity since genesis
  • 0 cross-region data egress events

Stack

  • Region: me-central-1
  • Locale: ar-SA · Hijri
  • Auth: Zitadel · OpenFGA · OPA
  • KYC: existing local vendor adapter
  • Custodian: two integrations

Illustrative case study based on representative deployment patterns. Customer name, quotes, and specific numbers are illustrative.

Your pilot

Discovery workshop → costed pilot → first tenant.

Eight weeks. Region pinned. Audit chain genesis. First advisors live.